Keurig Dr Pepper and Microplastics: K-Cups, Water and Soda
Last reviewed: by the MicroPlastics Research Desk. Submit a correction or see our editorial standards.
Quick answer

On this page
- What Keurig Dr Pepper sells, and which parts touch plastic
- K-Cup pods: what they are made of and the recycling criticism
- Do Keurig coffee makers add microplastics?
- Core, Peñafiel and the bottled water question
- Dr Pepper, Canada Dry and other sodas
- Keurig Dr Pepper sustainability claims, evaluated
- The JDE Peet’s deal and what changes
- What would a useful Keurig Dr Pepper test look like?
- What the evidence does not establish
- What to do if you use Keurig Dr Pepper products
Key Takeaways
- K-Cup pods are a polypropylene cup with an aluminium lid and a paper filter. That tells you what touches hot water, not how much it sheds.
- Capsule-machine coffee has been measured, but not for a named Keurig. The oldest machine in the study gave the highest count.
- Core and Peñafiel, KDP’s own waters, are not in the major bottled-water studies. Evian, which KDP distributes as a partner brand, is.
- KDP says 96% of its packaging is designed for recyclability, compostability or reuse. That is an end-of-life figure, not a particle-release figure.
- The most practical changes are in your hands: the pod format, the age of the brewer, the mug, and how you store bottled drinks.
Keurig Dr Pepper, by the numbers that exist
- Keurig Canada penalty over K-Cup recyclability claims
- $3M
- plus $800,000 to an environmental charity; January 6, 2022
- Competition Bureau Canada
- SEC penalty over K-Cup recyclability statements to investors
- $1.5M
- FY2019 and FY2020 annual reports; neither admitted nor denied
- SEC, September 10, 2024
- particles per cup from three unnamed capsule machines
- 7–17
- 10 µm and larger, µ-FTIR; brands not named
- Al-Mansoori et al. 2025
- recycled plastic in KDP primary plastic packaging, 2025
- 16%
- target 25–35% by 2035
- KDP 2025 Commitments Summary
What Keurig Dr Pepper sells, and which parts touch plastic
Keurig Dr Pepper is two businesses in one company: the Keurig coffee system and a North American drinks portfolio that includes Dr Pepper, Canada Dry, 7UP, A&W, Snapple, Core, Bai and Peñafiel, plus partner brands it distributes, such as evian (KDP brands page). The microplastics question looks different for each, so here is the map.
KDP products: declared contact materials and the particle evidence we found (reviewed November 2026)
- Product
- K-Cup pods
- What touches the drink
- Polypropylene cup, aluminium lid, paper filter (Keurig)
- Particle evidence
- None for a named K-Cup brew
- What is unknown
- Release from the pod vs the machine, water and mug
- Product
- Keurig brewers
- What touches the drink
- Reservoir and water path not fully disclosed
- Particle evidence
- Unnamed capsule machines: 7–17 per cup
- What is unknown
- Any Keurig-specific count
- Product
- Core water
- What touches the drink
- 100% recycled PET bottle, excluding cap and label
- Particle evidence
- Not in Mason 2018 or other named studies we found
- What is unknown
- Any brand-named count
- Product
- Peñafiel
- What touches the drink
- Mineral water sold in Mexico; container varies
- Particle evidence
- None found
- What is unknown
- Any brand-named count
- Product
- evian (partner brand)
- What touches the drink
- PET bottle, plastic cap (Danone brand)
- Particle evidence
- Mason 2018: lot means 197 and 58.2/L
- What is unknown
- A current count; KDP distributes, Danone bottles
- Product
- Dr Pepper, Canada Dry, 7UP and other sodas
- What touches the drink
- PET bottles, aluminium cans with an undisclosed liner
- Particle evidence
- None brand-named
- What is unknown
- Liner chemistry and any particle data
K-Cup pods: what they are made of and the recycling criticism
Keurig’s own recycling page says all K-Cup pods are made from polypropylene, #5 plastic, the same family as yogurt tubs. You peel off the aluminium lid, empty the grounds, and leave the paper filter in. Polypropylene is a common, relatively heat-tolerant food-contact plastic, but it is still plastic, and in a pod it meets near-boiling water under pressure.
Most of the public criticism has been about what happens to the pod afterwards. In January 2022 the Competition Bureau Canada found Keurig Canada’s claims that K-Cup pods are recyclable were false or misleading where they aren’t accepted, noting that outside British Columbia and Quebec pods were not widely accepted in municipal programs. Keurig Canada agreed to a $3 million penalty, an $800,000 donation to an environmental charity, $85,000 in costs and corrective notices. In September 2024 the SEC fined KDP $1.5 million because its 2019 and 2020 annual reports said testing “validate[d]” that pods could be recycled, without disclosing that two of the largest US recyclers had significant concerns. KDP neither admitted nor denied the findings.
Keurig’s page now says pods are “not recycled in many communities” and to check locally, and it flags its California recyclability claims as unresolved. All of this matters for waste. None of it is a test of microplastics in coffee, and it shouldn’t be read as one. The K-Cup and coffee pod guide compares pod construction with Nespresso and reusable options.
Do Keurig coffee makers add microplastics?
The closest evidence is the Al-Mansoori, Harrad and Abdallah study of UK drinks (open PDF). Three home capsule machines gave 17 ± 2, 10 ± 2 and 7 ± 2 particles per cup, counting particles 10 µm and larger. The oldest, an 8-year-old machine with a PET tank, gave the most. The paper did not name the machine brands, and machine age, tank plastic and capsule brand all differed, so this is a clue about wear, not a Keurig number.
Keurig does not publish a full material list for its reservoirs, needles and brew heads. Its new Alta brewer, launched in October 2026, uses pressed coffee rounds without a plastic cup; no particle test has been published for that system either. The Keurig coffee maker page covers the brewer question, the Alta and what to change in your own setup.
Core, Peñafiel and the bottled water question
KDP’s best-known water is Core. Since 2021 its bottles have been made from 100% post-consumer recycled PET, excluding cap and label (BevNET release). Peñafiel is KDP’s Mexican mineral water brand. Neither appears in the 2018 Mason study of 11 brands or in other brand-named counts we reviewed, so there is no Core or Peñafiel figure to report.
Evian is different. It is a Danone water that KDP lists as a partner brand. In the Mason study, Evian’s two lots averaged 197 and 58.2 particles per litre, with a highest bottle of 256/L, near the low end of the 11 brands. Those were bottles bought in 2017, counted mostly in the 6.5–100 µm range. Recycled PET, as in Core, changes where the plastic came from. Whether it changes what the bottle sheds into water has not been settled in the sources we reviewed. The cap is usually the bigger clue: polypropylene, the common cap plastic, was the most frequent polymer in the Mason bottles. See the bottled water brands ranking for every brand with data.
Dr Pepper, Canada Dry and other sodas
KDP sodas come in PET bottles and aluminium cans. Cans have an internal polymer coating, and KDP does not publish its liner chemistry in anything we found, so we won’t guess it. We found no particle test naming a KDP soda. Category studies of soft drinks exist, and the soda microplastics guide explains what they measured and compares cans, PET and glass. Glass is not automatically clean: ANSES found more particles in glass-bottled drinks than in plastic ones and traced them to paint on metal caps.
Use the App
Check the KDP products you actually buy
Scan a pod box, a Core bottle or a soda. The app reads the declared container, cap and liner, shows whether that brand has a published particle test, and suggests a lower-plastic swap. Available on iOS and Android.
Keurig Dr Pepper sustainability claims, evaluated
KDP’s 2025 Commitments Summary reports three packaging numbers: 96% of packaging designed for recyclability, compostability or reuse; 16% post-consumer recycled plastic in primary plastic packaging, on the way to 25% to 35% by 2035; and a 21% reduction in virgin plastic across its packaging portfolio, measured against the baseline in its methodology document.
| Claim or finding | What it measures | What it does not tell you |
|---|---|---|
| 96% designed for recyclability, compostability or reuse | Packaging design against recycling criteria | Whether items are actually recycled where you live, or what they shed |
| 16% PCR plastic | Share of recycled feedstock in primary plastic packaging | Particle release from recycled vs virgin plastic |
| 21% less virgin plastic | Reduction against a company baseline | Total plastic in contact with your drink |
| K-Cups made from #5 polypropylene | The pod body material | Release during brewing |
| Canada 2022 and SEC 2024 settlements | Accuracy of recyclability statements | Food safety or microplastics |
A fair evaluation is that KDP discloses more about end-of-life than about food contact. It has been penalised twice for overstating recyclability. We found no KDP publication of microplastic testing for its pods, waters or sodas, which is also true of most of its competitors.
The JDE Peet’s deal and what changes
KDP completed its roughly $18 billion acquisition of JDE Peet’s, the maker of Jacobs, L’OR and Peet’s, on April 1, 2026 (Cleary Gottlieb). It plans to split into two listed companies: a North American drinks company, Beverage Co., and a coffee company, Global Coffee Co., which is expected to include Keurig. As of this review the split had not happened. For shoppers, nothing about pod or bottle materials changes on the day of a corporate split; any change would show up on the box.
What would a useful Keurig Dr Pepper test look like?
The missing piece is a matched test, and it is worth knowing what one would involve so you can judge any number that appears later. For pods, it would brew the same coffee and the same filtered water three ways in the same brewer: through a genuine K-Cup, through a stainless reusable filter, and through the machine with no pod at all. Only that design separates the pod from the reservoir, needle and brew head. Repeating it on a new and an old brewer would test the wear question the UK study raised.
For Core or a KDP soda, a useful study would buy several lots from different plants and dates, run blanks, state its lower size limit, and identify polymers so a polypropylene cap fragment can be told apart from a PET bottle fragment or a lab fibre. Counts from methods with different size cutoffs can’t be compared directly: a 10 µm method and a nanoplastic method can differ by thousands of times on the same water. When you see a claim about a KDP product, ask which product, which lot, what size range and who paid for it.
What the evidence does not establish
- A particle count for any named KDP product. The reviewed sources did not include one for K-Cups, Core, Peñafiel or a KDP soda.
- That polypropylene pods are the main source in a cup. The capsule-machine study did not separate pod, machine, water and cup.
- That recycled PET sheds more or less than virgin PET. We found no matched comparison for a KDP bottle.
- A health outcome. The FDA says current evidence does not show that microplastic levels detected in foods pose a risk to human health, while research continues.
What to do if you use Keurig Dr Pepper products
- Pods: if you want less hot plastic contact, a stainless reusable filter compatible with your model removes the polypropylene cup. Check its seals and fit. It is a material change, not a measured reduction.
- Brewer: follow the manual for descaling and cleaning. If a machine is many years old and its tank is scratched or cloudy, that is the part worth questioning.
- Mug: brew into ceramic or glass rather than a plastic-lidded travel cup when you can. The coffee cup guide covers lids and liners.
- Bottled water and soda: keep bottles cool and out of the sun, and don’t refill single-use PET for weeks.
- Recycling: check your local program before putting pods in the bin, as Keurig itself now advises.
What the MicroPlastics app checks
- The declared pod, bottle, cap or can material of a scanned KDP product.
- Whether that brand has a published particle test, with its year, size cutoff and sample size.
- Handling that changes contact: heat, brewer age, storage time and reusing single-use bottles.
- A lower-plastic alternative for the same drink. The app reads product information; it does not measure particles in your cup.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does Keurig Dr Pepper have microplastics in its products?
What are K-Cup pods made of?
Why was Keurig fined over K-Cups?
Does Core water have microplastics?
Is Keurig Dr Pepper sustainable?
Do Dr Pepper cans have microplastics?
Sources
- Competition Bureau Canada (2022). Keurig Canada to pay $3 million penalty to settle Competition Bureau’s concerns over coffee pod recycling claims. Government of Canada, 6 January 2022.
- US Securities and Exchange Commission (2024). SEC charges Keurig with making inaccurate statements about the recyclability of K-Cup pods (press release 2024-122). SEC, 10 September 2024.
- Keurig (2026). K-Cup pod recycling: polypropylene #5, local acceptance and California note (retrieved November 2026). keurig.com.
- Al-Mansoori M, Harrad S, Abdallah MA-E (2025). Synthetic microplastics in hot and cold beverages from the UK market: comprehensive assessment of human exposure via total beverage intake. Science of the Total Environment 996:180188.
- University of Birmingham (2025). Al-Mansoori et al. 2025, open article PDF (section 3.2, capsule machines). University of Birmingham repository.
- Keurig Dr Pepper (2026). 2025 Commitments Summary. Keurig Dr Pepper.
- Keurig Dr Pepper (2026). Our brands (retrieved November 2026). keurigdrpepper.com.
- BevNET (2021). Core Hydration 100% post-consumer recycled plastic bottles now on shelf (excluding cap and label). BevNET.
- Mason SA, Welch VG, Neratko J (2018). Synthetic polymer contamination in bottled water. Frontiers in Chemistry 6:407.
- Cleary Gottlieb (2026). Keurig Dr Pepper completes $18 billion acquisition of JDE Peet’s. Cleary Gottlieb, 2 April 2026.
- ANSES (2025). The caps of glass bottles contaminate beverages with microplastics. ANSES, 20 June 2025.
- US Food and Drug Administration (2024). Microplastics and nanoplastics in foods (retrieved November 2026). FDA.
Your next product question
Start with the KDP product you use most: a K-Cup box, Core bottle or soda.
Identify the pod, bottle, cap or can. Recycling settlements and the 96% recyclable-design figure are not particle tests, and no KDP product has a named count.
Use the exact product name, model and label to check the information behind an assessment. A photo does not measure particles or personal health risk. The examples above are research subjects, not a verified app-coverage list.
Check the brewer side of your setup →Related Research
Does Kellogg’s Cereal Have Microplastics? Liners, Pringles and Tests
We found no microplastic test of a named Kellogg’s cereal. What its HDPE-core liners and Pringles tubes are made of, why the 2010 liner recall was chemical, who owns Kellogg’s now, and what to do.
Read moreAre Insulated Food Jars Safe? Lids, Gaskets and Lead
A stainless vacuum food jar is a good hot-lunch choice. We trace what touches the food (the plastic lid and gasket), what Stanley, Thermos and Klean Kanteen say about lead in the vacuum seal, and how to preheat and clean one.
Read moreAre Silicone Baking Mats Safe? Mats vs Parchment for Baking
Silicone mats release siloxane molecules, mostly when new and into fatty food, not a counted particle load. Heat limits for Silpat and parchment, when to replace a fiberglass-reinforced mat, and when a greased bare pan is the better liner.
Read moreThanksgiving Dinner Plastic Swaps: What to Change, What to Keep
A whole-meal plan for Thanksgiving: swap the nylon oven bag, plastic carving board and microwave reheating in plastic; keep foil pans and an intact nonstick pan; brining bags and paper plates are low priority.
Read moreAre Takeout Soup Containers Safe? Plastic, Foam and Paper
Winter soup arrives in polypropylene deli tubs, foam cups or plastic-lined paper. What hot-water and microwave studies tested, how close they are to real soup, and the transfer-and-reheat routine that avoids the hottest contact.
Read moreMicroplastics in Sugar: What the Studies Found, and One That Was Retracted
Sugar studies report anywhere from 75 suspected particles per kilogram to about 300 per gram, depending on how small the lab looked. We compare the 2026 Greek and Italian studies, explain the retracted Bangladesh paper, and cover white vs brown vs raw and packaging.
Read more