Does Cheese Have Microplastics? Sliced, Shredded & Block Compared (2026)
Last reviewed: by the MicroPlastics Research Desk. Submit a correction or see our editorial standards.
Quick answer

On this page
Key Takeaways
- Microplastics have been detected in dairy products, so there is a supply-chain baseline before any packaging is added.
- Cheese has the highest film-contact-to-weight ratio in the dairy aisle. Shredded and individually wrapped formats are the extreme cases.
- Cheese is fatty, and several plastic-film additives are fat-soluble, which makes migration into cheese more favourable than into milk.
- Pre-shredded cheese also carries anti-caking agents such as cellulose or potato starch, a separate additive question from the plastic itself.
- Buying a block and grating it yourself is the single biggest reduction available, and it is cheaper per kilo.
Start with the dairy baseline
A 2021 study in Science of the Total Environment developed a method for detecting small microplastics in dairy products and found them present. That work matters because it establishes something important: the plastic is not only coming from the wrapper. Dairy picks up particles across the supply chain, from environmental contamination of feed and water through to the polymer tubing, membranes, gaskets and seals that milk passes through during processing.
Cheese inherits all of that, because cheese is concentrated milk. It takes roughly ten litres of milk to make one kilogram of hard cheese, and the curd retains fats and solids while whey carries water away. Anything that partitions into the fat and protein fraction rather than the water fraction gets concentrated by that process rather than diluted by it. See microplastics in milk & dairy for the underlying mechanism in full.
The two things that make cheese different
Cheese is not just another dairy item on this measure. Two features push it up the list.
- Surface area against film. A litre of milk touches the inside of one container. A bag of shredded cheese has thousands of individual shreds tumbling against plastic film through transport and weeks of refrigeration. Individually wrapped singles are the same problem taken further: every slice gets its own film on both faces. Per gram eaten, these formats involve far more plastic contact than almost anything else in a fridge.
- Fat solubility. This is the part usually left out. Migration from packaging into food is governed partly by how well the migrating substance dissolves in the food. Many plasticisers and film additives are lipophilic, meaning they dissolve readily in fat and poorly in water. Regulators recognise this directly: fatty foods are treated as a more aggressive test condition than aqueous ones in food-contact materials testing. A 30%-fat cheddar pressed against film for a month is a considerably more favourable migration environment than milk in a jug.
Worth being clear on the limits: this reasoning is about chemical migration and plausible particle transfer, and no one has published a per-brand microplastic count for cheese. Anyone quoting you a specific number of particles in a specific cheese is making it up.
Cheese formats ranked
| Format | Packaging | Main driver | Verdict |
|---|---|---|---|
| Deli counter, cut to order | Wax or greaseproof paper | Dairy baseline only | Best. Ask for paper, not a plastic bag |
| Whole wheel or wedge with rind | Paper, cloth, or natural rind | Dairy baseline only | Excellent. The rind is its own barrier |
| Vacuum-sealed block | Multi-layer plastic film, tight | Film contact on outer surface | Good. Trim and discard the outer few millimetres |
| Block in a resealable bag | Polyethylene bag | Film contact, looser | Good. Repack in glass or wax paper at home |
| Fresh cheese in a tub (ricotta, cottage) | PP tub + film lid | Tub contact, high moisture | Moderate. Decant on opening |
| Pre-sliced, stacked | Film pack, interleaved | Both faces of every slice | Weak. High contact per gram |
| Pre-shredded in a bag | PE bag + anti-caking agent | Enormous surface area + additives | Weak. Grate a block instead |
| Individually wrapped singles | One film per slice | Maximum film per gram | Worst common format |
| Squeeze-tube or spray cheese | Plastic tube or lined canister | Full-volume contact, long shelf life | Worst overall |
The ordering is essentially a ranking of how much processing and convenience you are buying. Every step towards convenience adds film contact, and the two cheapest upgrades on this list, asking the deli counter for paper and grating your own block, also happen to save money.
The pre-shredded cheese problem
Pre-shredded cheese is worth its own note because it has two separate issues stacked on each other.
The first is the surface area already described. The second is that shredded cheese cannot be sold loose without an anti-caking agent, or it fuses into a solid lump in the bag. Manufacturers use powdered cellulose, potato starch, or natamycin. These are not microplastics and are generally regarded as safe, but they are additives you are eating that are not in cheese, and cellulose in particular is added at a few percent by weight. If you are reading a microplastics article you are probably also the sort of person who would rather not.
Grating a block takes about forty seconds, melts better because there is no starch coating, and costs meaningfully less per kilogram.
Practical changes worth making
- Buy blocks, grate your own. Biggest single improvement, and cheaper.
- Ask the deli for wax or greaseproof paper rather than letting them drop it in a plastic bag. They will, if you ask.
- Trim vacuum-sealed blocks. Cutting off and discarding the outer few millimetres removes the layer that spent weeks pressed against film.
- Repack at home in glass or beeswax wrap instead of leaving cheese in the bag it came in for a fortnight. See best plastic-free food storage.
- Never microwave cheese in its packaging. Heat plus fat plus film is the worst combination of the three variables that matter.
- Skip the singles and the squeeze tubes. They are the extreme end of film-per-gram, with no compensating advantage.
What the MicroPlastics app checks
- The packaging format of the exact cheese you buy, block, vacuum pack, pre-shredded bag, or individually wrapped singles.
- A 0–100 risk score that accounts for film contact, fat content, and additives together rather than treating all cheese the same.
- Anti-caking agents and other additives listed on pre-shredded and processed cheese labels.
- A lower-plastic swap in the same cheese style, usually the block version of the shredded product already in your basket.
Use the App
Scan the cheese in your fridge
Shredded, sliced, or block changes the plastic-contact story far more than the brand does, and singles are the extreme case. Scan your cheese with MicroPlastics for a 0–100 score and a lower-plastic version of the same thing.
Related: microplastics in milk & dairy, does Fairlife have microplastics, microplastics in yogurt, and best plastic-free food storage.
Frequently Asked Questions
Does cheese have microplastics?
Is shredded cheese worse than block cheese?
Why would cheese absorb more from packaging than milk?
Are individually wrapped cheese singles the worst option?
Should I cut the outside off vacuum-sealed cheese?
Sources
- Da Costa Filho PA, Andrey D, Eriksen B, et al. (2021). Detection and characterization of small-sized microplastics in dairy products. Science of the Total Environment.
- Kedzierski M, Lechat B, Sire O, et al. (2020). Microplastic contamination of packaged meat: occurrence and associated risks. Food Packaging and Shelf Life.
- Cox KD, Covernton GA, Davies HL, et al. (2019). Human consumption of microplastics. Environmental Science & Technology.
Compare what your food and drink touch
Save products, review declared materials and compare modeled contact inputs. Scans do not measure particles in food or beverages.
- iOS and Android
- Current terms in each store
“Really cool to scan stuff around the kitchen and see what's actually in it. The swaps it suggests are realistic.” App Store review · 5.0★
Related Research
Does Canned Tuna Have Microplastics? Brands & Can Liners Compared (2026)
Less than canned sardines, and for a reason worth knowing: tuna is gutted loin, and marine microplastics concentrate in the gut that gets removed. The can liner is the bigger question. StarKist, Wild Planet, Safe Catch and glass jars compared.
Read moreDoes Graza Olive Oil Have Microplastics? The Squeeze Bottle Question
Updated August 2026: an independent LDIR test reported 2 microplastic particles per millilitre in Graza EVOO — one PTFE, one rubber. PTFE is not the squeeze bottle material, which points at processing equipment rather than packaging. Plus why fat extracts more from plastic than water does.
Read moreOlive Oil Brands Ranked by Packaging: Glass, Tin & Squeeze Bottles (2026)
Olive oil is the highest-fat thing in most kitchens, and fat is what pulls additives out of plastic. Dark glass and tin are the clean formats, clear plastic the weakest. Brightland, Kirkland, California Olive Ranch, Graza and Bertolli compared.
Read moreIs Fellow Aiden Plastic-Free? What Fellow Says It’s Made Of
No. Fellow lists Aiden’s materials as plastic, stainless steel and silicone and names the plastic as PPO, without saying which parts. Compared with Moccamaster, Ratio, Caraway, Breville and OXO by what touches hot water.
Read moreDoes a Moka Pot Have Microplastics? The Gasket, the Valve and the Aluminum Question
Stovetop moka pots are metal apart from the gasket. We trace Bialetti Moka Express, Brikka and Venus, Alessi 9090 and an electric model, and explain the aluminum study: at most 4% of the EU weekly limit.
Read moreDoes a French Press Have Microplastics? Every Part, Model by Model
Traces the beaker, lid, frame and filter stack of the Bodum Chambord, Brazil and Caffettiera, ESPRO P3/P7 and Frieling. Shows which presses keep plastic out of the coffee, and why diterpenes are a separate issue.
Read more