Skip to main content
All data tables

Brand database

Coffee Pod Brand Microplastic Database (2026)

12 coffee pod brands audited for body material and the polymer that touches hot water. The ranking is by construction, because particle release has barely been measured: the one study of capsule coffee found 7 to 17 synthetic microplastics per cup, with older machines releasing more (Al-Mansoori et al. 2025), and no study has compared brands.

12 coffee pod brands audited for body material and hot-water contact
Brand / SystemBodyWhat has been measuredRisk
Keurig K-Cups (standard)

92–96°C pressurised through PP wall, 20–30 s

#5 PolypropyleneCapsule coffee: 7–17 microplastics per cup in one study; pod not isolatedHigh
Keurig 2.0 K-Cups

Recyclability change did not alter polymer chemistry

#5 Polypropylene (redesigned for recyclability)Not separately measuredHigh
Nespresso Original

~25 ml espresso, ~25 s, smallest pod, shortest brew

Aluminum + food-grade polymer linerNot measuredLow
Nespresso Vertuo (espresso 40 ml)

Centrifusion 6,000–7,000 rpm adds liner agitation

Aluminum + polymer linerNot measuredMedium
Nespresso Vertuo (Mug 230 ml)

Larger pod + longer brew time = more liner contact

Aluminum + polymer linerNot measuredMedium
Nespresso Vertuo (Alto 414 ml)

Largest Vertuo pod size; longest brew

Aluminum + polymer linerNot measuredMedium
illy iperEspresso (aluminum)

Some retail SKUs use polymer-body instead, check

Aluminum capsuleNot measuredLow
illy ESE (Easy Serving Espresso, paper)

Paper-based pod; polymer is only in the seal

Paper + thin polymer hot-sealNot measuredLow
Lavazza A Modo Mio

Outer collar plastic is not in hot-water path

Aluminum + plastic outer collarNot measuredLow
Halo Compostable Pods

PLA is a synthetic polymer; data sparse

PLA + plant-fiber compositeNot measuredMedium
Woken Compostable Pods

Compostable claim is industrial only, not home compost

PLA + plant-fiber compositeNot measuredMedium
Reusable Stainless Steel Pod (K-Cup compatible)

One-time $10–25 cost; removes the pod wall from the hot-water path

304 stainless + silicone gasketNot measured; no pod plastic in the water pathLow

Methodology

  • Material disclosure: pulled from manufacturer spec sheets, recycling-symbol disclosure on the pod, and Keurig + Nespresso public material statements.
  • What has been measured: only one study has counted microplastics in capsule coffee (Al-Mansoori et al. 2025: 7–17 synthetic microplastics per cup, particles 10 µm and up, three home machines). It did not isolate the pod and did not compare brands, so every other cell says “not measured”. The widely quoted “billions per cup” figure comes from a 2019 study of plastic tea bags (Hernandez et al.), not coffee pods.
  • Risk tier: High = polymer body in full hot-water contact. Medium = aluminum with larger liner area or longer brew, OR compostable PLA where data is sparse. Low = aluminum with short brew + small pod, OR reusable stainless.

Primary sources

  1. Al-Mansoori M, Harrad S, Abdallah MAE (2025). Synthetic microplastics in hot and cold beverages from the UK market. Science of the Total Environment.
  2. Hernandez LM, Xu EG, Larsson HCE, Tahara R, Maisuria VB, Tufenkji N (2019). Plastic teabags release billions of microparticles and nanoparticles into tea. Environmental Science & Technology (McGill).
  3. Keurig Dr Pepper, manufacturer pod material specifications (2024). Keurig brewer + pod product information.
  4. Nespresso, capsule material disclosure (2024). Nespresso capsule recycling information.

Scan your coffee setup before the next order

Use the MicroPlastics iOS app to check the pod box, the brewer, and the cup. 0–100 risk score, cited research, cleaner same-machine swap if there is one.

Download on the App Store

Data compiled by the MicroPlastics Research Desk. Last reviewed: June 29, 2026. Submit a source dispute or correction via the contact page.