Microplastics in Chewing Gum: The 2025 UCLA Study Explained
Last reviewed: by the MicroPlastics Research Desk. Submit a correction or see our editorial standards.
Quick Answer
Got a different brand in the cupboard? Scan the label for its polymer, risk score, and a cleaner swap.
Scan my product
On this page
Key Takeaways
- The 2025 UCLA pilot study tested 10 popular gums and found average release of ~100 microplastic particles per gram of gum, with some samples releasing 600+ per gram.
- A typical 2–3 g piece of gum releases roughly 200–600 particles during a single chewing session, with most release in the first 8 minutes.
- Both “synthetic” and “natural” gums showed contamination, the “natural” label is not regulated for gum base.
- The dominant polymers are polyethylene, polyvinyl acetate, styrene-butadiene, and polyolefins, all common in industrial plastics.
- The annual exposure from a daily gum-chewing habit is on the order of 30,000 microplastic particles per year, comparable to a year of bottled-water consumption.
Why chewing gum contains plastic
Most consumers don't realise that the “gum base” in commercial chewing gum, the elastic, water-insoluble part that you actually chew, is typically a synthetic polymer. FDA regulations allow more than 45 different ingredients to be used in gum base, including:
- Polyethylene (the same polymer as plastic bags)
- Polyvinyl acetate (used in white glue)
- Styrene-butadiene rubber (used in car tyres)
- Polyisobutylene (synthetic rubber)
- Paraffin wax (petroleum-derived)
On the label, all of this appears simply as “gum base”, the FDA does not require manufacturers to disclose which polymers are used.
What the 2025 UCLA study actually measured
Mohanty and Lowe's team tested 10 popular gum brands (5 marketed as synthetic, 5 marketed as natural). They had a single chewer chew each sample for up to 20 minutes, then analysed the saliva for microplastic particles using Raman spectroscopy.
Key results:
- Average release: ~100 microplastic particles per gram of gum.
- One outlier brand released 600+ particles per gram.
- 94% of particles were released within the first 8 minutes of chewing.
- Both synthetic-labelled AND natural-labelled gums released particles in similar ranges, suggesting label claims are unreliable.
- The dominant polymers found in saliva matched those used in industrial-grade gum bases: polyolefins, polyacrylamides, and polystyrenes.
How chewing gum compares to other daily microplastic sources
| Source | Particles per exposure | Annual estimate (typical use) |
|---|---|---|
| One piece of chewing gum (20 min) | ~200–600 | ~30,000 (daily user) |
| 1 L bottled water | ~325 (micro) / 240,000 (nano) | Daily user: 100,000+ micro |
| 1 L tap water | ~5 | Daily user: ~1,800 |
| 1 plastic tea bag steeped | ~11.6 billion (nano) | Heavy: trillions |
| Microwave 1 plastic container | ~4 million | Adds up fast |
| Indoor air (24 h breathing) | ~70,000 inhaled | ~25 million |
What you actually swallow
Not every particle released ends up in your gut, some stick to teeth, cheek, and tongue surfaces, some get spat out with the gum. The UCLA team estimated that a typical chewer ingests roughly half of the released particles. For someone who chews one piece a day, that's on the order of 15,000 microplastic particles swallowed per year just from gum.
How to chew with less plastic
- Switch to chicle-based gum. Real chicle comes from the sapodilla tree (manilkara zapota) and is the traditional plant-based gum base. Brands like Glee Gum, Simply Gum, and Chicza use chicle. Read the ingredients list, it should list “chicle” or the specific tree gum, not “gum base”.
- Don't trust “natural” on the front of the pack.The UCLA study showed natural-marketed gums released particles in similar ranges. Check the ingredients list.
- Chew less, chew shorter. Most particles release in the first 8 minutes, so a single piece of gum is roughly the same exposure whether you chew it 20 minutes or 60.
- Consider alternatives. Xylitol-based mints, sugar-free chewy mints with sucralose, or simply a glass of water often satisfy the same craving with zero plastic exposure.
- Don't recycle wads. Re-chewed gum is harder, more abrasive, and tends to release more particles per minute of chew time.
Is chewing gum dangerous?
On a per-gram basis, gum is a relatively small fraction of total daily microplastic intake compared to bottled water, microwaved plastic containers, or indoor air. But it is also one of the easiest sources to eliminate, there's no functional cost to switching to chicle gum, whereas filtering water requires equipment and avoiding indoor plastic air requires HVAC changes.
For a complete reduction plan that addresses every major exposure source, see how to avoid microplastics.
What the MicroPlastics app checks
- Packaging material. PET, HDPE, PP, PS, multi-layer, glass, aluminum.
- Container condition from the photo, scratches, dents, fade.
- Product category, fresh, packaged, canned, frozen, takeout.
- Use-context flags you log, microwave, heat, reuse, time stored.
- Cited research behind the 0–100 risk score.
Use the App
Use the app as a grocery-store second opinion
Scan the product, check the packaging score, compare alternatives. The MicroPlastics app weighs material, condition, brand, and the cited research.
Scan groceries in the appFrequently Asked Questions
Does chewing gum contain microplastics?
Which chewing gum brands do not have plastic?
How many microplastics do you swallow from chewing gum?
Does "natural" gum have less plastic?
How long does it take gum to release most of its plastic?
Sources
- Lowe LE, Mohanty SK (2025). Chewing gum as a potential source of microplastic exposure: pilot study. American Chemical Society Spring Meeting / UCLA preprint.
- US Food and Drug Administration (2024). CFR Title 21 Section 172.615: Chewing gum base. US FDA.
- Hernandez LM, Xu EG, Larsson HCE, et al. (2019). Plastic teabags release billions of microparticles and nanoparticles into tea. Environmental Science & Technology.
- Hussain N, Jaitley V, Florence AT (2001). Recent advances in the understanding of uptake of microparticulates across the gastrointestinal lymphatics. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews.
Audit your whole pantry, not just the 5 foods in this article
The app keeps a running scan history for every packaged food you own, every brand swap you make, and every reformulation a brand quietly pushes. The article is a snapshot. The app is the trend line.
Download on the App Store- Free on iOS
- 3 free scans
- No sign-up
- Result in seconds
“Really cool to scan stuff around the kitchen and see what's actually in it. The swaps it suggests are realistic.” App Store review · 5.0★
Android · early access
Get the launch email the day Android opens.
One email. No spam. We send when the Android app is in the Play Store, and never again unless you opt in.
Related Research
Does Trident Gum Have Microplastics? Yes — It's in the Gum Base (2026)
Yes. Trident’s “gum base” is a synthetic petroleum-based plastic, and a 2025 UCLA study found chewing gum sheds 100–600 microplastic particles per gram of saliva. The honest catch: natural gum shed similar amounts.
Read moreDoes Orbit Gum Have Microplastics? The Synthetic-Base Verdict (2026)
Yes. Orbit uses a synthetic petroleum-based gum base, and a 2025 UCLA study found chewing gum sheds 100–600 microplastic particles per gram. Sugar-free does not mean plastic-free, here is the honest verdict.
Read moreDoes Simply Gum Have Microplastics? The Honest Chicle Verdict (2026)
Simply Gum uses a chicle (tree-sap) base with no synthetic plastic, a real ingredient upgrade over Trident or Orbit. But the 2025 UCLA study found natural gums shed microplastics at similar levels. The nuanced verdict.
Read moreDo Coffee Filters Have Microplastics? Paper vs Plastic vs Mesh (2026)
Paper coffee filters are mostly cellulose and low-risk, the real plastic contact is the dripper, the machine brew basket, and nylon mesh reusable filters steeping in hot water. The cleanest setup, ranked.
Read moreMicroplastics in Coffee Creamer: It's the Packaging, Not the Cream (2026)
No study measures microplastics in creamer itself, the exposure is packaging. Single-serve cups (polystyrene) topped with hot coffee are the worst, PET bottles next. The cleaner swaps, ranked.
Read moreDo Keurig Coffee Makers Have Microplastics? The Honest Answer (2026)
Yes, but far less than the internet claims. A Keurig heats water through a polypropylene pod and its own plastic reservoir and tubing. The one study that measured capsule-brewed coffee found about ten microplastic particles per mug, not the billions spread online. The honest evidence, the machine vs the pod, and the swaps that actually cut it.
Read more