Skip to main content
Back to Research

Microplastics and Miscarriage Risk: What the Research Shows

Microplastics and miscarriage risk — what research shows

Quick Answer

Multiple human cohort studies have linked higher maternal exposure to BPA, phthalates, and PFAS — the plasticisers that travel on microplastic particles — to increased risk of miscarriage, recurrent pregnancy loss, and preterm birth. The strongest evidence is for phthalates and BPA; PFAS evidence is growing. Most pregnancy losses have no identifiable cause, and no single exposure causes miscarriage on its own. But because the same exposures that increase miscarriage risk also increase preterm birth and low birth weight risk, reducing plasticiser exposure is a reasonable precaution before and during pregnancy.

Key Takeaways

  • About 10-20% of known pregnancies end in miscarriage; the true rate including very early losses is higher.
  • Most miscarriages are due to chromosomal abnormalities and cannot be prevented — but a subset are linked to environmental factors.
  • Phthalate metabolites in maternal urine are associated with higher miscarriage risk in multiple human cohorts.
  • BPA levels have been linked to recurrent pregnancy loss in case-control studies.
  • PFAS exposure is associated with miscarriage, preeclampsia, and low birth weight in growing evidence.
  • Reduction is reasonable: filter water, eliminate plastic in food storage and reheating, audit cosmetics for phthalates and parabens.

Important context first

Pregnancy loss is common and overwhelmingly not the fault of the person who experienced it. About 10–20% of known pregnancies end in miscarriage, and the rate is higher when very early losses (before a missed period) are included. The single biggest cause is chromosomal abnormality at conception — these losses are not preventable by anything the mother did or did not do.

That said, a portion of pregnancy losses are linked to environmental and chemical exposures. This is where reducing microplastic and plasticiser exposure can play a precautionary role — not as a guarantee, but as one modifiable factor.

What the human research shows

Microplastic-related chemicals and pregnancy loss — human studies
ChemicalCommon sourceEvidence summary
DEHP & phthalate metabolitesSoft PVC, vinyl, fragrance, food wrapMultiple cohorts show higher urinary metabolites associated with higher miscarriage risk
BPAPolycarbonate, can linings, thermal receiptsCase-control studies link higher BPA to recurrent pregnancy loss
BPS / BPF (BPA replacements)Modern “BPA-free” plastics, receiptsSimilar endocrine activity; less studied but flagged
PFAS (PFOA, PFOS, GenX)Non-stick cookware, water, stain resistanceLinked to miscarriage, preeclampsia, low birth weight
ParabensCosmetics, lotions, deodorantsEndocrine disrupting; some association with reduced fertility and pregnancy complications
Microplastic particles themselvesWater, food, airNo direct human miscarriage study yet; biological pathway plausible via inflammation

How plasticisers may affect pregnancy

  1. Hormone disruption. BPA, phthalates, and parabens mimic or block estrogen and androgen signaling — both critical for implantation and early placental development.
  2. Thyroid interference. Phthalates and PFAS alter thyroid function. Maternal hypothyroidism is associated with higher miscarriage risk.
  3. Oxidative stress. Both particles and their additives generate reactive oxygen species, damaging trophoblast (early placental) cells.
  4. Inflammation. Microplastic particles trigger pro-inflammatory cytokines. Implantation requires precise inflammatory balance — too much disrupts it.
  5. Placental dysfunction. Animal studies show MP exposure reduces placental weight and impairs nutrient/oxygen transfer.

For people trying to conceive or in early pregnancy

The highest-leverage reduction window is before pregnancy and in the first trimester, when implantation and placental formation occur. Practical priorities:

  1. Filter drinking water. A NSF P473-certified pitcher (Clearly Filtered) or reverse osmosis system removes 99%+ of microplastics and many PFAS. See filters compared.
  2. Eliminate plastic in food contact with heat. No microwaving plastic, no hot food in plastic, no dishwasher-heat-warped containers. Replace with glass (Pyrex, Anchor).
  3. Switch from non-stick to stainless or cast iron. Non-stick PTFE pans release PFAS at high heat. See non-toxic cookware ranked.
  4. Audit cosmetics. Avoid “fragrance/parfum” (often phthalate-laden), parabens (methyl-, propyl-), and BHA/BHT. EWG Skin Deep is the easiest filter.
  5. Skip thermal receipts or ask for digital — thermal receipts are coated with BPA or BPS that absorbs through skin.
  6. Switch food storage to glass. A glass starter set is around $40–80. Same for travel — stainless or silicone.
  7. Avoid bottled water. 240,000 plastic particles per liter (Qian 2024, PNAS).

For people who have experienced pregnancy loss

First — most losses are not caused by anything you did, and no amount of plastic avoidance would have prevented a chromosomal abnormality. The reason to reduce going forward is precautionary, not retrospective.

For those experiencing recurrent pregnancy loss (typically defined as two or more consecutive losses), a workup with a reproductive endocrinologist is warranted. Some clinicians now include environmental exposure history as part of that workup. Discuss plastic and chemical reduction as one component of a broader plan, alongside other recommended evaluations.

What this article is not

  • This is not medical advice. Decisions about pregnancy care should be made with your OB/GYN or maternal-fetal medicine specialist.
  • This does not assign blame. The evidence connecting environmental exposures to pregnancy loss is population-level, not individual.
  • This does not say plastic reduction prevents miscarriage. It says it reduces one of many modifiable risk factors.

See related: pregnancy by trimester, microplastics in the placenta, microplastics and fertility, and BPA-free pregnancy guide.

What the MicroPlastics app checks

  • Baby/kid product material — glass, stainless, silicone, polypropylene, PPSU.
  • Packaging type — jar vs pouch vs multi-layer plastic.
  • Brand and product line — clean certifications flagged.
  • Use-context flags you log — sterilization heat, dishwasher cycles, age.
  • Cited published research behind each 0–100 score.

Use the App

Scan baby gear and pregnancy products before buying

Bottles, sippy cups, baby food pouches, cosmetics. The app weighs material + brand + condition and suggests cleaner-packaged alternatives.

Scan baby gear in the app

Frequently Asked Questions

Can microplastics cause miscarriage?

No human study has shown that microplastic particles directly cause miscarriage. However, the plasticisers carried by them — phthalates, BPA, PFAS — have been linked in multiple human cohort studies to higher miscarriage risk through hormone disruption, thyroid interference, and inflammation. Most miscarriages are caused by chromosomal abnormalities and could not have been prevented by reducing any exposure.

Which plastic chemicals are most linked to pregnancy loss?

Phthalates (particularly DEHP) have the strongest evidence from human cohort studies. BPA is linked to recurrent pregnancy loss in case-control studies. PFAS (the "forever chemicals" in non-stick cookware and water) are linked to miscarriage, preeclampsia, and low birth weight in growing evidence. Parabens are flagged for endocrine disruption.

I have had a miscarriage. Was it my fault for using plastic?

No. The overwhelming majority of pregnancy losses are caused by chromosomal abnormalities at conception that no amount of plastic avoidance could prevent. The research linking environmental exposures to pregnancy loss is population-level and probabilistic, not individual. Reducing exposures going forward is precautionary, not corrective.

When should I start reducing plastic exposure if I want to get pregnant?

Ideally three to six months before trying to conceive. This allows the body to clear some shorter-lived chemicals (phthalates clear within days; BPA within hours; PFAS persist for years), reduces baseline body burden, and establishes habits before pregnancy begins. The first trimester is when most miscarriages occur, so reductions before that window matter most.

What is the single highest-impact change?

Filtering your drinking water. A NSF P473-certified pitcher or reverse osmosis system removes 99%+ of microplastics and reduces PFAS. Daily water intake is substantial, exposure is direct, and bottled water (the common alternative) is actually 22× more contaminated than filtered tap.

Should I get my BPA or phthalate levels tested?

Routine testing is generally not clinically useful — levels fluctuate daily based on recent exposures, and there is no agreed-on threshold for action. The more practical approach is to reduce exposures broadly: filter water, eliminate plastic food contact with heat, audit cosmetics for fragrance and parabens, avoid thermal receipts.

Sources

  1. Lathi RB, Liebert CA, Brookfield KF, et al. (2014). Conjugated bisphenol A in maternal serum in relation to miscarriage risk. Fertility and Sterility.
  2. Gao H, Wang YF, Huang K, et al. (2017). Prenatal phthalate exposure in relation to gestational age and preterm birth in a prospective cohort. Environmental Research.
  3. Krieg SA, Shahine LK, Lathi RB (2016). Environmental exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals and miscarriage. Fertility and Sterility.
  4. Buck Louis GM, Smarr MM, Sundaram R, et al. (2017). Endocrine disruptors and neonatal anthropometry, NICHD Fetal Growth Studies — Singletons. Environment International.
  5. ACOG Committee Opinion 832 (2021). Reducing prenatal exposure to toxic environmental agents. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.

Start Scanning Your Products Today

Download the MicroPlastics app and instantly check any product for microplastic content. Free to start with 5 scans.

Download for iOS

Related Research