Skip to main content
Back to Research

Microplastics in Arterial Plaque: The 2024 NEJM Heart Study

Last reviewed: by the MicroPlastics Research Desk. Submit a correction or see our editorial standards.

Quick Answer

In March 2024 a team led by Raffaele Marfella at the University of Campania published a landmark study in the New England Journal of Medicine. They examined carotid-artery plaque removed from 257 patients during surgery and found polyethylene microplastics in 58% and PVC in ~12%. Over the 34-month follow-up, patients with plastics in their plaque had a 4.53× higher risk of heart attack, stroke, or death from any cause. This is the first prospective human evidence linking microplastic exposure to cardiovascular events.

Want your own baseline? Scan the products you use daily and start with the worst-scoring one.

Scan my product
Microplastics found in carotid artery plaque. NEJM 2024 study

Key Takeaways

  • The Marfella 2024 study is the first prospective human trial connecting microplastic presence in tissue with measurable cardiovascular harm.
  • Polyethylene (PE) and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) were the dominant polymers found in plaque, the same polymers used in water pipes, packaging, and disposables.
  • The hazard ratio of 4.53 was statistically robust and held after adjusting for age, sex, BMI, smoking, hypertension, diabetes, and statin use.
  • Tissue near plastic particles showed elevated inflammatory markers (IL-6, IL-18, TNF-α), a plausible biological mechanism for the harm signal.
  • The trial does not prove causation, but it changes the burden of proof: the “harmless until proven otherwise” default is no longer scientifically defensible.

What the study actually did

Marfella and colleagues enrolled 304 patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy, a routine surgery to remove fatty plaque from neck arteries. Of these, 257 completed the 34-month follow-up. The team analysed the excised plaque using pyrolysis–gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, the same technique used in the 2022 Leslie blood study, plus electron microscopy to visualise individual particles.

They then tracked which patients suffered a major adverse cardiovascular event (non-fatal heart attack, non-fatal stroke, or all-cause death) over the following ~3 years.

The headline number: 4.53× higher risk

Of the 150 patients whose plaque contained polyethylene or PVC, 30 (20%) had a heart attack, stroke, or died. Of the 107 patients with no detectable plastic, only 8 (7.5%) did.

After adjusting for the standard cardiovascular risk factors (age, sex, smoking, BMI, hypertension, diabetes, statin therapy, prior cardiovascular disease), the hazard ratio for the plastic-positive group was 4.53 (95% confidence interval 2.00–10.27). That confidence interval does not cross 1, meaning the result is statistically significant, and the effect size dwarfs many traditional risk factors.

Why this study mattered scientifically

  1. It is prospective, not retrospective. The plaque samples were taken first and the patients were followed forward in time, the gold standard for causal-inference epidemiology.
  2. It is in humans, not rodents. Most microplastic toxicology before 2024 was either in vitro or in laboratory animals at unrealistic doses. This is real patients at real exposure levels.
  3. It links physical particles to clinical events. Not a biomarker, not an animal-model proxy, actual heart attacks, strokes, and deaths.
  4. It found a biological mechanism. Plaque containing plastic also showed elevated levels of the inflammatory markers IL-6, IL-18, and TNF-α, plus macrophage infiltration, a plausible chain from plastic to inflammation to plaque instability to clinical event.

Important limitations

The NEJM editorial accompanying the paper was unusually direct in its praise but also explicit about what this trial does not show:

  • Single-centre. All patients were treated at one Italian hospital. Replication in other populations is essential.
  • No exposure measurement. The study measured plastic in plaque but did not measure each patient's historical plastic intake. We cannot say which lifestyle behaviours led to which plaque content.
  • Association, not causation. Patients who accumulate plastic may also have other unmeasured risk factors. Randomising humans to plastic exposure is obviously impossible.
  • Endarterectomy patients aren't representative of the general population, these were people already sick enough to need surgery.

How did the plastic get into their arteries?

The dominant polymers (polyethylene and PVC) match the materials we ingest and inhale most. Polyethylene is everywhere: plastic bags, milk jugs, water pipes, food packaging films. PVC is in pipes, food wrap, vinyl flooring, and some medical tubing. From gut and lung absorption, particles small enough to cross epithelial barriers reach the bloodstream and can embed in inflammatory tissue like atherosclerotic plaque, where they accumulate over years.

See our explainer on microplastics in human blood for the upstream evidence on circulation.

What this means for everyday decisions

A 4.5× hazard ratio is large enough that it would change clinical guidelines if it were a drug. Until the result is replicated and quantified into a per-particle exposure relationship, no health authority will issue formal guidance. But the precautionary case for individual action is now stronger than at any prior point in the field.

The highest-leverage exposure reductions, supported across the entire peer-reviewed literature, remain:

  1. Filter your tap water (RO or carbon block) and stop drinking bottled water
  2. Replace plastic food storage and water bottles with glass or stainless steel
  3. Never heat food or water in plastic, microwaving releases millions of particles per container per cycle
  4. Choose natural fibres and HEPA-filter indoor air
  5. Reduce ultra-processed and heavily packaged food

For a full action plan, see how to avoid microplastics and how to reduce kitchen microplastics.

What the MicroPlastics app checks

  • Product packaging. PET, HDPE, PP, PS, PVC, multi-layer, glass, aluminum.
  • Container condition from photo, scratches, dents, fade.
  • Brand and product category, flags for known PFAS / BPA / fragranced lines.
  • Use-context flags, heat exposure, microwave, reuse cycles.
  • Cited published research, every score links the specific studies behind it.

Use the App

Translate the research into 5-second shelf decisions

Reading the studies is step one. Acting on them at the grocery store is step two. The MicroPlastics app scores each product 0–100 using research like this.

Get the MicroPlastics app

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the 2024 NEJM microplastics study find?

In 257 patients followed for 34 months after carotid plaque removal, those whose plaque contained polyethylene or PVC microplastics had a 4.53× higher risk of heart attack, stroke, or death from any cause, after adjusting for standard cardiovascular risk factors.

Does microplastics in arteries cause heart attacks?

The 2024 study shows a strong statistical association but cannot prove causation in a single trial. The 4.53× hazard ratio, supported by elevated inflammatory markers in plastic-positive plaque, makes a causal contribution biologically plausible and is shifting clinical opinion.

Which plastics were found in human arteries?

Polyethylene was detected in 58% of plaque samples and polyvinyl chloride (PVC) in approximately 12%. Both are common in food packaging, water pipes, plastic films, and disposable products.

Can plastic in arteries be removed?

There is no medical procedure to remove embedded microplastics from atherosclerotic plaque short of surgical endarterectomy. The only proven intervention is reducing ongoing exposure so future accumulation is slower.

How do microplastics get into arteries?

Particles small enough to cross the gut wall or pulmonary epithelium enter the bloodstream. They tend to accumulate in inflammatory tissue, including atherosclerotic plaque, where they may persist for years and amplify local inflammation.

What can I do to reduce my arterial microplastic exposure?

The four highest-leverage daily actions are: filter your tap water (RO or carbon block), eliminate bottled water and plastic food storage, never heat food in plastic, and use HEPA-filtered indoor air. Consistency over years matters more than perfection.

Sources

  1. Marfella R, Prattichizzo F, Sardu C, et al. (2024). Microplastics and nanoplastics in atheromas and cardiovascular events. New England Journal of Medicine 390:900-910.
  2. Landrigan PJ. (2024). Editorial: Microplastics, the Heart, and the Public's Health. New England Journal of Medicine.
  3. Leslie HA, van Velzen MJM, Brandsma SH, et al. (2022). Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood. Environment International.
  4. World Health Organization (2022). Dietary and inhalation exposure to nano- and microplastic particles and potential implications for human health. WHO.

Turn this article into a personal exposure baseline

Scan the 5–10 products you read about here. The app saves your baseline, tracks each swap you make, and shows whether your overall exposure score is dropping month over month.

Download on the App Store
  • Free on iOS
  • 3 free scans
  • No sign-up
  • Result in seconds

“Really cool to scan stuff around the kitchen and see what's actually in it. The swaps it suggests are realistic.” App Store review · 5.0★

Android · early access

Get the launch email the day Android opens.

One email. No spam. We send when the Android app is in the Play Store, and never again unless you opt in.

Related Research

Do Zyn Pouches Have Microplastics? The Contested 2026 Answer

Unresolved. Zyn pouches are a semi-synthetic cellulose fleece that reportedly resembles cellulose acetate. Richard Thompson sees shedding potential; no study has measured it; a July 2026 report found the FDA lacked full composition data.

Read more

Does Vaping Produce Microplastics? What the Evidence Does and Doesn't Show (2026)

Not proven. No study has confirmed microplastics in e-cigarette aerosol, though the plastic device, heat, and deep-lung deposition make it plausible. The honest evidence, and why vaping’s established harms are separate.

Read more

Are Microplastics Dangerous? What 5 Years of Human Studies Show (2026)

Microplastics in blood (Leslie 2022), placenta (Ragusa 2021), arterial plaque (Marfella 2024 NEJM, 4.53× heart-attack risk), brain (Campen 2024 Nature Medicine), pancreas (Yan 2024): the complete 2026 evidence map for whether microplastics actually harm the human body.

Read more

How Long Do Microplastics Stay in Your Body? The 2026 Elimination Timeline

Some microplastics pass through the gut in 24–72 hours. Others enter the bloodstream and accumulate in tissues for years. The 2026 evidence on elimination, half-life, and what (if anything) speeds clearance.

Read more

Microplastics and Diabetes: How Plastic Chemicals Affect Blood Sugar

BPA, BPS, phthalates, and PFAS are linked to 15-60% higher type 2 diabetes risk in major prospective studies (NHS II, E3N, NHANES). The Endocrine Society position, the 2024 microplastics-in-pancreas finding, the T1/T2/GDM differences, and the highest-yield exposure swaps.

Read more

Microplastics and Thyroid: How Plastic Chemicals Disrupt Hormones

BPA, BPS, PFAS, and phthalates from microplastics are linked to thyroid dysfunction. Here is what 2024-2026 research shows and how to reduce exposure.

Read more